一票によって変わる、だれがやっても政治は変わらないという人がいるが

一票によって変わる、だれがやっても政治は変わらないという人がいるが
安部さんがなぜ日銀の白川総裁に強く言えるのか
自民党に大量の投票がなされた民意というバックあるからである
政治家に民意が表現されるのである
来年、政党助成金が発表になると思われるが
日本の場合対象となる条項を設けている
1.国会議員5人以上を有する政治団体
2.国会議員を有し、かつ、前回の衆議院議員総選挙の小選挙区選挙若しくは比例代表選挙又は前回若しくは前々回の参議院議員通常選挙の選挙区選挙若しくは比例代表選挙で得票率が2％以上の政治団体
ただし、法人格を取得していない政党には交付されません
２％以上投票がなければ助成金は受け取れない
ドイツでは投票数が５％以上なければ政党とは認めない
日本は政党としての力が弱い、だから政権交代しても官僚がのさばる
チームで仕事をする、もっと政党力をつけなければ政党助成金がむだになる
There is the person whom the politics does not turn into even if anyone changing by one vote does it, but
Why can Abe strongly say to President Shirakawa of Bank of Japan?
This is because there is a background called the popular will that mass votes were made by the Liberal Democratic Party
The popular will is expressed by a politician
It is thought that a political party grant is announced next year, but
In the case of Japan, I make a target article
1. Political organization having five Diet members or more
2. A vote rate is 2% political organizations more than it in the electoral district election of the single-seat election constituencies election of the last member of the House of Representatives general election I have a Diet member, and to win or proportional representation election or in the last time or the member of the House of Councilors ordinary election before last or proportional representation election
But it is not issued in the political party which does not acquire a juridical person
I cannot receive the grant without a vote more than 2%
If a poll can cry more than 5% in Germany, I do not recognize it as the political party
In Japan, the power as the political party is weak; therefore a bureaucrat has everything on his/her way even if make change of government
A political party grant is wasted if I do not acquire more political parties power working by a team